The field of Staff Augmentation Software Development is very complicated. The inadequate and ambiguous specifications and measurements, the quickly evolving technology, and the inescapable dangers associated with third-party software all contribute to the complexity of the situation. As a result, it is exceedingly difficult or nearly impossible to foresee everything at once. Software developers need to be prepared for defects when creating software because they could occur both during development and after the product is released.
But why do issues show up following a release? Does the development cycle assume testing has thoroughly examined everything? There are three causes for this:
1) Different exam circumstances. The program is tested under specific circumstances on a predetermined list of devices. What could possibly not be considered? The solution is other mobile devices, the state of the Internet connection, and the applications that are already loaded on these devices;
2) Different action sequences. QA engineers test optimistic scenarios to ensure that the program functions flawlessly throughout testing. The software is additionally tested to determine if it functions properly without an Internet connection by simulating the worst-case scenarios;
3) New OS releases and independent APIs. There is an agreed-upon list of supported OS versions in advance. A common issue is an upgrade to the Facebook or Twitter API; following such updates, the software may simply not operate or crash repeatedly.
The following is how the suggested method for post-release work (bug fixing, project support, and introducing new features) operates. A small staff continues to implement features, switching immediately to bug fixing and customer support when necessary. As a result, the project will advance and any unforeseen issues will be fixed right away. The client may be confident that users will get the software update right away.
It is conceivable to include Staff Augmentation Software Development if necessary if the funding for the post-release work is tight. The developers who previously worked on the project should be involved in this. They are able to complete the required work as quickly as feasible and have greater knowledge of the project’s specifics than anyone. Given that they are working in other projects, they might not be involved right away. It takes time to switch to the project, and there are many tasks that need to be gathered for implementation for at least one week (40 hours). The client would not prefer it if warranty and SLA were offered because they would increase the project expense. The client pays the developer on an hourly basis for post-release work that is done on a regular basis.
But in this instance, the client may have valid queries:
– Why should he/she pay to remedy bugs in software that the QA team had already tested?
– Developers are paid more the more hours they put in. So, is there a reward for producing high-quality software with few bugs?
Is the development firm accountable for the work it produces?
These are good, logical queries coming from a client who has considered the circumstances. After the release, bugs are unavoidable. Since nothing can be predicted, the client must be prepared to use the budget as soon as it is released. The organization must constantly strive to produce high-quality software in the meantime. What motivates them to do high-quality work?
– The business has no interest in extending the development phase. It’s usually preferable to gain new clients and projects by being referred as a capable contractor.
– The business has no interest in scaring away potential customers with exorbitant estimates that take all hazards into account; the business is engaged in completing tasks quickly while maintaining high standards, finding the ideal compromise for the client. The success of the business depends on the success of the client’s product. That has to do with self-motivation and the business’s unique definition of success; Finally, a smart business appreciates its reputation, seeks out long-term customer partnerships for new initiatives, and respects client referrals.
In addition to managing the development infrastructure, the company is also in charge of maintaining a reliable working group. Another qualified expert can always be obtained if a developer is ill (or cannot work on the project for any other reason) or if the developer does not meet the client’s criteria for some reason;
– fulfilling deadlines for tasks (not of the whole project). Only intrinsic reasons can result in excessive estimations (such as the risks of third-party APIs).
– the software, the end product of labor.
